Visualização normal

Received before yesterdayNegócios

Real estate investors using rentals for cash flow are switching to more passive strategies to make money while they sleep

23 de Junho de 2026, 06:30
real estate passive income
Some experienced real estate investors are using rentals as a launching pad, and then pivoting to more passive strategies.

HAKINMHAN/Getty Images

  • Buying rental properties is a popular way to get into real estate investing, but it's not passive.
  • Experienced real estate investors are shifting from rentals to more passive strategies.
  • Two popular, more hands-off strategies are real estate syndications and private money lending.

A popular way to get started in real estate investing is by buying a rental property. After finding and closing on a deal, investors place a tenant and ideally collect more in rent than they owe each month on the mortgage and expenses. Whatever is left over is cash flow.

It can be a lucrative income stream, but real estate investors are upfront about one caveat: It's not passive. Owning rentals means dealing with tenant turnover, maintenance requests, vacancies, repairs, and, in some cases, evictions.

That's why some experienced investors are using rentals as a launching pad. Once they've built capital and experience, they're shifting to more passive strategies that allow them to keep exposure to real estate without taking on the day-to-day responsibilities of being a landlord.

Two such strategies have come up repeatedly in Business Insider's conversations with financially independent investors: real estate syndications and private money lending.

Real estate syndications

A syndication allows investors to put money into a larger real-estate deal — such as an apartment complex, student-housing development, or boutique hotel — without personally buying or operating the property. A sponsor or operator manages the deal, while investors typically receive cash-flow distributions and, if the property is eventually sold for a profit, a share of the proceeds.

Cody Berman, who started with a house hack and later bought rentals that generated enough cash flow for him to live on, said much of his real-estate exposure today comes through syndications.

"My return on effort in my main business, my digital-products business, is a lot higher than my return on effort in real estate," he said. "I still want the real-estate exposure, but I don't want to go out there and just buy a 20-unit apartment building myself and then have to get it tenanted and figure out how to set up all the maintenance stuff."

cody berman
Cody Berman has shifted from buying rental properties to investing in syndications.

Courtesy of Cody Berman

In a syndication, Berman said, he might invest in a 100-unit apartment complex in another part of the country — a property he has never seen in person — because he trusts the operator running the deal.

"I will invest a chunk of money with them for some set period of time, usually somewhere from three to seven years," he said. "I'll make money every quarter on cash-flow distributions based on the rent the property is generating. And then if there is a sale event, which is usually the goal of a syndicator, then I'll get all my money back and some more in the form of a check."

He described it as "owning rental properties without actually having to own rental properties."

There are trade-offs. Investors in syndications generally do not have the same control or upside as the general partner running the deal. Their money is also typically locked up for years.

Choosing the right operator is crucial, added Berman, who relies on referrals, interviews, and research.

"Pretty much everyone that I've ever invested with has been through a word-of-mouth referral plus an interview, talking to the person, doing my research."

Private money lending

Another strategy experienced investors use to keep real estate in their portfolio without owning additional property is private money lending. Instead of buying or renovating properties themselves, they lend money to other investors who need capital for deals.

To get started in private lending, you need capital and, ideally, a presence within your local real estate community. Real estate is a relationships business, and typically, the broader your network, the more opportunities you'll encounter.

Carl and Mindy Jensen, who grew their net worth to more than $5 million and retired early, have tried a variety of investment strategies, including live-in flipping. They said that private lending is one of their favorite strategies.

"The private lending generates such a nice return that it's difficult to be like, 'No, we don't want to have the easy money. Let's go do another live-in flip,'" said Mindy. "But we're also in a much different financial position now than we were when we started live-in flipping, and I think that's important to note: You could still make money live-in flipping, and if you have more time than money, it can be a really great way to turn your home into an investment."

Josh and Ali Lupo, another financially independent couple, started lending to other real-estate investors in 2025, and it's resulted in double-digit returns.

"There are some industry standards," Josh said. "In the private money lending world, 10 to 12% interest is very common. That's the baseline."

The lender generally determines the terms of the loan, he added, and the rate can vary depending on the deal's length.

Private lending is not risk-free. One of the main risks is that the borrower fails to repay the loan, which makes vetting both the borrower and the deal essential. That due diligence takes time, but once the Lupos have completed their research and decided to fund a deal, the process itself is relatively hands-off, said Josh.

"It takes us 30 minutes driving to the bank, wiring the funds, and then the investor that is borrowing the money sends us updates, and that's the extent of it."

Read the original article on Business Insider

The state with the highest income isn't New York or California. See the 15 states where people earn the most.

6 de Junho de 2026, 12:17
The downtown Manhattan skyline at Dusk.
The median income in the US is about $83,000, but some states clear that number by a lot.

AerialPerspective Images/Getty Images

  • WalletHub ranked states where people have the highest income, using several different measurements.
  • Some states with mega-high earners didn't rank high due their fairly average median incomes.
  • California landed outside of the top 10 as many high earners are leaving the state.

The median income in the US is about $83,000 — and you could make more or less than that number depending on where you live. But which states are the highest earning overall?

A new WalletHub study used three income-related measures to rank states: the average annual income of the top 5%, the average annual income of the bottom 20%, and the median annual household income of the state's entire population.

The resulting rankings include some surprises. None of the states known for being home to billionaires, like New York, California, and Florida, took the top spot.

WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo said New York's income disparity is a reason it came up just short of the No. 1 ranking. While the top 5% makes a lot, the state's middle class isn't making nearly as much.

"In terms of just the median annual income, which I think is what most people are interested in as far as that's a reflection of the middle class, New York is a little above average in terms of its median annual income at $96,000," Lupo told Business Insider.

One state that barely cracked the top 15 is California; a state known for movie stars and moguls. Lupo posited that the Golden State's lower ranking on the list may have been impacted by several top earners leaving.

"What's going on in California also is the number of high-wealth individuals that are fleeing the state," Lupo said. "A lot of wealth is moving out of the state and into more tax-friendly states like Texas, Florida, and Tennessee. So that's a huge driver."

Read on for the 15 states where people have the highest income, according to WalletHub.

15. Florida
The skyline of the Brickell neighborhood in Miami, with illuminated buildings and palm trees under a colorful twilight sky.
Miami.

tifonimages/Getty Images

Total score: 49.89

Average annual income of top 5%: $507,073

Median annual income: $75,737

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $16,378

14. Georgia
The Atlanta, Georgia skyline in the evening.
Atlanta.

Dan Reynolds Photography/Getty Images

Total score: 52.76

Average annual income of top 5%: $516,260

Median annual income: $72,437

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $17,301

13. California
Aerial view of downtown San Francisco skyline.
San Francisco.

Prasit photo/Getty Images

Total score: 53.45

Average annual income of top 5%: $482,584

Median annual income: $133,974

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $14,662

12. District of Columbia
An aerial view of Capitol Hill in Washington, DC at sunset.
Washington, DC.

halbergman/Getty Images

Total score: 54.11

Average annual income of top 5%: $488,074

Median annual income: $174,287

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $9,579

11. Texas
Regency Tower, Bank of America Building, Dallas Skyline, Dallas America
Dallas.

joe daniel price/Getty Images

Total score: 54.93

Average annual income of top 5%: $520,378

Median annual income: $75,905

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $17,651

10. Massachusetts
The Boston skyline.
Boston.

DenisTangneyJr/Getty Images

Total score: 57.11

Average annual income of top 5%: $498,062

Median annual income: $137,563

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $14,440

9. Illinois
The Chicago skyline at golden hour.
Chicago.

Aerial_Views/Getty Images

Total score: 57.88

Average annual income of top 5%: $533,840

Median annual income: $83,277

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $16,813

8. Minnesota
The Minneapolis skyline.
Minneapolis, Minnesota.

joe daniel price/Getty Images

Total score: 58.66

Average annual income of top 5%: $500,074

Median annual income: $90,632

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $20,662

7. Colorado
Aerial view of Denver, Colorado skyline at sunset.
Denver, Colorado.

Ultima_Gaina/Getty Images

Total score: 59.65

Average annual income of top 5%: $498,587

Median annual income: $106,187

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $19,588

6. Utah
Aerial of downtown of Salt Lake City, Utah.
Salt Lake City, Utah.

Vadym Terelyuk/Getty Images

Total score: 61.24

Average annual income of top 5%: $475,515

Median annual income: $98,858

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $24,307

5. Connecticut
Hartford, Connecticut skyline.
Hartford, Connecticut.

Sean Pavone/Getty Images

Total score: 64.73

Average annual income of top 5%: $543,016

Median annual income: $122,032

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $15,095

4. Washington
Seattle downtown skyline and Mount Rainier, Washington.
Seattle.

SCStock/Getty Images

Total score: 65.23

Average annual income of top 5%: $522,328

Median annual income: $112,933

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $19,082

3. New Jersey
The Jersey City skyline.
Jersey City, New Jersey.

OlegAlbinsky/Getty Images

Total score: 66.08

Average annual income of top 5%: $527,376

Median annual income: $125,766

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $17,418

2. New York
Aerial view of skyscrapers in Midtown Manhattan.
New York.

Art Wager/Getty Images

Total score: 66.27

Average annual income of top 5%: $585,523

Median annual income: $96,746

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $13,633

1. Virginia
The Arlington, Virginia, city skyline on the Potomac River.
Arlington, Virginia.

SeanPavonePhoto/Getty Images

Total score: 67.57

Average annual income of top 5%: $545,097

Median annual income: $95,339

Average annual income of bottom 20%: $19,671

Read the original article on Business Insider

Andrew Yang says AI could swell economic inequality at an 'epic, unprecedented scale'

25 de Abril de 2026, 06:18
Andrew Yang
Andrew Yang advocated for a universal basic income during his 2020 US presidential campaign.

JP Yim/Getty Images for The Asian American Foundation

  • Andrew Yang says AI could cause considerable inequality.
  • He said a basic income policy will be "necessary" to address the issues.
  • Yang floated a universal basic income during his 2020 presidential campaign.

AI-related layoffs are already hitting America's job market, and former presidential candidate Andrew Yang thinks the fallout could be substantial.

During an interview on The New York Times' "Hard Fork" podcast, Yang said the technology, when compounded with America's current economy, could lead to "inequality on an epic, unprecedented scale."

"We're going to have our first trillionaire. The folks at the top stratum of American life are going to get richer and richer. It's going to compound over itself," Yang said. "Then there are going to be a lot of families wondering what the heck happened. My kids studied hard, there's no job, they have these school loans, they're in my basement, they're getting depressed."

He said a basic income policy will be "necessary" to address these issues. A universal basic income — a program in which a government provides recurring, unconditional checks to all citizens — was a key part of Yang's 2020 presidential campaign. During that time, he introduced the Freedom Dividened, a universal basic income program that would have provided all American adults a $1,000-per-month payment, no strings attached.

Yang received pushback at the time from some lawmakers, including Democratic Sen. Bernie Sanders, who instead suggested providing guaranteed federal jobs to address workforce automation.

Lawmakers are divided on basic income. While some believe it could boost economic stability, others worry it could discourage Americans from working and be expensive to fund. Many leading Big Tech personalities have, on their end, advocated for basic income programs in response to AI's impact on employment.

Tesla billionaire Elon Musk, a longtime advocate of basic income, recently said that a "universal high income" will be the "best way" to deal with AI-related unemployment.

"AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation," he wrote on X this month.

During the interview, Yang said there should "100%" be a tax on AI, which could help balance the income gap in the US economy.

"It should be going out to people and workers in various ways. We should try and find ways to get off of taxing human labor," Yang said.

He added, "So tax AI. Tax the bots. Don't tax humans."

Read the original article on Business Insider

❌